WebDec 28, 2024 · The answer is yes all tasks started in FirstBatchProcess will complete before it executes SecondBatchProcess Original Task.WhenAll Method Creates a task that will complete when all of the supplied tasks have completed. I think you maybe getting confused with the await operator await (C# Reference) WebMay 30, 2024 · Best practice is to mark function async void only if it is fire and forget method, if you want to await on, you should mark it as async Task. In case if you still want to await, then wrap it like so await Task.Run ( () => blah …

.net - c# wait for a task inside a loop - Stack Overflow

WebAug 14, 2024 · (1) Task.WaitAll, as well as its overloads, when you want to do some tasks in parallel (and with no return values). var tasks = new [] { Task.Factory.StartNew ( () => DoSomething1 ()), Task.Factory.StartNew ( () => DoSomething2 ()), Task.Factory.StartNew ( () => DoSomething3 ()) }; Task.WaitAll (tasks); Web1 Answer. You would have to keep track of the tasks you create to be able to refer to them later. For example: private static List _taskList = new List (); private static void TaskMethod () { while (runningService) { // This will create more than one task in parallel to run and each task can take upto 30 minutes to finish _taskList ... how to send to a friend

c# - Waiting for task to be finished - Stack Overflow

WebSince the UI thread is busy waiting for the entire task to complete, you have a deadlock. Moving the async call to Task.Run () solves the issue. Because the async call is now running on a thread pool thread, it doesn't try to come back to the UI thread, and everything therefore works. WebMay 25, 2024 · 3. You need to await that method: await c8y_pushEvent (c8y_Event_MSG); //calling async method. To use await keyword, you need to add async keyword to your parent method. But if you want to run asynchronous method synchronously, it is a different problem. There are answers already to it on SO. WebMar 26, 2016 · foreach (var item in items) { task = Task.Factory.StartNew ( () => doWork ()); task.Wait (); //update the UI using the result } I am waiting for the task to finish, because I need to process every item in the list, but as you imagine this is causing a lock in my UI thread (the UI freezes).WebFeb 9, 2016 · In your code callCount () starts running synchronously to await task, then back to Main () method, and since you are not waiting for the method to complete, the program ends without method count () can finish. You can see the desired behavior by changing the return type to Task, and calling Wait () in Main () method.WebMay 30, 2024 · Best practice is to mark function async void only if it is fire and forget method, if you want to await on, you should mark it as async Task. In case if you still want to await, then wrap it like so await Task.Run ( () => blah …WebDec 16, 2010 · Is you want to wait until some task is done, use Thread.Sleep (0) or Thread.Sleep (100) to avoid burning 100 percent of the CPU core just for waiting one flag to be raised. There are methods with events and semaphores, but this one is simple and it won't hurt a bit. Share Improve this answer Follow answered Dec 16, 2010 at 9:55 Daniel …WebTask.Wait () should just return true if the task is completed, so sure you can. However, you should better use waiting with timeout or TimeSpan parameter if you have actions inside of while { } loop that can possibly cause a freeze. Share Improve this answer Follow answered Nov 29, 2012 at 10:04 Oleg Leontiev 81 1 4 how to send transcripts through scoir