WebJul 21, 2011 · So, readonly fields are not "a lie". The contract is, if everyone obeys the rules of the system then the field is observed to be readonly. If someone breaks the rules, … WebJul 5, 2024 · A collection that is read-only is simply a collection with a wrapper that prevents modifying the collection; therefore, if changes are made to the underlying collection, the read-only collection reflects those changes. This can't happen with an ImmutableList. Solution 2 ReadOnlyCollection doesn't solve any of the thread safety problems.
Add HashSet.AsReadOnly · Issue #29387 · dotnet/runtime
WebJun 11, 2013 · Read-only collections are useful for designing safe APIs, where only the owner of the collection is allowed to change it. However, it won’t do any good for thread … WebJun 29, 2024 · To create immutable DTOs, you can take advantage of a ReadOnlyCollection or the thread-safe immutable collection types in the System.Collections.Immutable namespace. Alternatively, you... under the castle
ReadOnly does not mean Immutable - Programming is Magic
WebNov 14, 2024 · an ImmutableList is one you can not add or delete items from. The add / delete operations create a new list. The advantage of them when passed to a method, the method knows the list can not change, that is the list is read only. the item in list may or may not be immutable items. WebApr 26, 2024 · The reason for this is that ReadOnlyCollection requires the underlying collection to implement IList, which HashSet does not do on its own. This means that a AsReadOnly () method which returns a ReadOnlyCollection necessarily needs to make a copy of the contents of the HashSet instance. Contributor Author WebApr 10, 2024 · It’s pretty common for writable (mutable) collections to have both read-only and read/write interfaces. The read-only interfaces not only enable working with collections covariantly, but they also... under the chin medical term